Tuesday 8 November 2016

A good definition of a PULL production system

Good definition of a Pull production system.

What Is main Difference between a Push and Pull production system?

A pull production system is one that explicitly limits the amount of work in process that can be in the system. [...] a push production system is one that has no explicit limit on the amount of work in process that can be in the system. (Hopp and Spearman "To Pull or Not to Pull")

A True pull has an upper limit on work in progress, WIP

The Kanban system dictates a fixed upper limit on the work in progress. You cannot have more material than what is allowed by the kanban card ( or signal). The limit is explicitly defined by the kanban card ( or signal )

Selected Source:
Hopp, Wallace J., and Mark L. Spearman. “To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 6, No. 2 (April 1, 2004): 133–48. doi:10.1287/msom.1030.0028.

Monday 7 November 2016

Ronald Fisher and Karl Pearson the Grandfathers of Six Sigma !

Why are Ronald Fisher and Karl Pearson not celebrated and discussed more in Six Sigma forums and in Lean Six Sigma training courses the same way as the likes of Shewhart, Deming and Juran ?  ( I am already telling my students about them !)  Could it be because Fisher and Pearson's main focus was not on Industrial Manufacturing and Business ?   Nevertheless, many of the statistics used today in Six Sigma tools and techniques ( Correlation, Regresssion, DOE , Capability Analysis etc ) are based on the work of either Ronald Fisher or Karl Pearson.  If Walter Shewhart is the Father of Statistical Process Control, then surely Fisher and Pearson are the Grandfathers !

Wednesday 26 October 2016

The truth behind the 7 wastes…not what most people think !

The truth behind the 7 wastes…not what most people think !
In most training courses about the '7 wastes' ( or the 8 wastes … TIM WOOD, DOWNTIME, WORM PIT etc ) it is taught as if there was something magical and all-inclusive about this number 7 ( or 8). This was certainly not the intention of Taiichi Ohno, originator of the 7 wastes at Toyota and architect of TPS. The true intention of Ohno was to give a few examples of some key area where waste if found, however he made it clear that wasted time, effort, energy is present wherever work is being done and can take many different forms depending on what we are working on. The important point is to be able to recognize where the waste is in our work and to always strive to reduce it. On page 175 of the 100th Birthday edition of 'Workplace Management' by Taiichi Ohno ( original Japanese edition 1982 ), Ohno is quoted as follows, and I think this explains all that needs to be said :
‘‘…people often talk ‘ about ‘the seven types of waste’. This might have started when the book came out, but waste is not limited to seven types. There is an old expression : ‘He without bad habits has seven’, meaning even if you think there is no waste you will find seven types. So I came up with Overproduction, Waiting etc., but that doesn’t mean that there are only seven types. So don’t bother thinking about ‘what type of waste is this?’ Just get on with it an do kaizen. ’’
( Quote on p 175, references on p 179 Workplace Management :Taiicho Ohno 100th Birthday edition. )

Monday 24 October 2016

Top 20 Hospitals in USA all have Lean programs...and some have Six Sigma too !

Chris Alcock and I have recently been researching the penetration of Lean or  Six Sigma or Lean 6 Sigma in hospitals in the USA.


The above URL names the top 20 best hospitals in the USA, 2016,  according to a detailed study undertaken by the US News magazine. (See also text attachment)
So I started from the top, seeing which ones had undertaken Lean / 6S / L6S initiatives.

1st place Hospital - yes
2nd place Hospital - yes
3rd place Hospital - yes
4th place Hospital - yes
...
9th place Hospital - yes
10th place Hospital - yes
...
19th place Hospital - yes
20th place Hospital - yes

All yes!

We have the URLs of our research as evidence.

We also found evidence of the use of Lean Six Sigma ( not just Lean )...
...hallelujah!  

Cost Savings/Efficiencies
• Completed 18 LEAN/Six-Sigma projects with substantial sustained improvements; three were VA Network (Florida & Caribbean) award winners.
• Added three new dialysis stations to our unit with a projected savings in Non-VA Care of $500,000.
• Completed first renewable energy project by installing photovoltaic panels on two campus buildings that will reduce FP&L consumption by 50%.
 
 
Charleen R. Szabo is West Palm Beach VA Medical Center Director. For more information, visitwww.westpalmbeach.va.gov.

Conclusion: Lean 6 Sigma is used by all of the best hospitals in the USA. And Virginia Mason wasn't even in the top 20!
That is a pretty powerful body of evidence in support of Lean and Six Sigma.

Does a Black Belt need to know and use CPM and PERT methods for project management ?

Hello,

I was just asked by Rene C. from Nice, France, while he was preparing for his Black Belt, if he needed to know the details of how to use Critical Path Method ( CPM )  or Program Evaluation and Review Tequnique ( PERT ) in order to be a Black Belt ?

This is a common question so I though I would repeat my answer to Rene here.

Rene,

In order to pass the Lean Six Sigma Black Belt exam ( whether it is IASSC, ASQ or any other examination body ) you will NOT be required to know about the details for how to calculate the Critical Path ( CPM) of a project or use the PERT method for project / activity duration.  You should be familiar will all the concepts of CPM, PERT, WBS and Gantt Charts however this is not tested in any detail in the exams.

A Lean Six Sigma Green Belt or Black Belts needs understand that in the IMPROVE phase of a DMAIC project you will need to 1.  Choose the best solution to correct the Root Cause of the problem  2. Pilot or Prototype the solution  3.  Provide a Control and Training Plan for the solution so you and then workers know what to do as soon as it is implemented  4.  Implement the solution into production / business-as-usual.

The details of the skills, tools and knowledge required for the Implementation part of the IMPROVE phase are part of the Body of Knowledge for Implementation Project Managers and are found in such courses as PRINCE2 and the PMP or CAPM certifications ( see PMP.org).   This is where you would be tested on the details of CPM, PERT, Network diagrams, Gantt Charts etc.

It is often appropriate for a a Black Belt to choose and appoint a separate Implementation Project Manager just for the Implementation part of the IMPROVE phase since the Project Management skills required for Implementation have a different focus than those of a Black Belt.

Here are 2 quick 5 minute videos covering CMP and PERT that give everything you need to know as a Black Belt,  but even this will NOT be tested in your BB exam.



I hope this helps.  Let me know if anything is still not clear.

Tuesday 4 October 2016

Optimization : Making the most of what your customers want

During my years teaching in Lean Six Sigma I have found myself using the word 'Optimization' at least once a week during my classes...usually during the part about 'Designed Experiments' and 'Response Surface Methods' ,  however I have recently been thinking that the word 'Optimization' should be introduced to Students much earlier during the "Fundamentals of Lean Six Sigma'' sections of the class.  It strikes me that "Optimization' is the perfect ENGLISH word for the goal of Lean Six Sigma with regards to the Outputs of Processes and the resources that provide them in the process.   In general terms we want to Optimize the 'Value' of the Outputs 'in the eyes of the customer',  while at the same time 'Optimizing'  the use of our resources to deliver that value.  In less general terms Optimization needs to be applied to such Output measures such as Comfort, On-time Delivery,  Product Availability,  Product Purity, Battery Life,  Durability,  Price ...things important to our customers....while at the same time also Optimizing the use of our time, people  machines,  vehicles,  storage space, electricity, energy etc.

Kudos to Joseph Burk and his excellent book ' Cost Reduction and Optimization for Manufacturing and Industrial Companies'  in which he points out specifically that the concepts have been used in Operations Management in the west for decades,  however Lean Six Sigma still treats it as something 'new' and not a fundamental method/tool/principal.

Edward C. Lai  and his presentation ' Lean Six Sigma Optimization'  http://www.slideshare.net/elai1001/lssowebsite  does a good job of tying together the fact that Optimization is essentially what Lean Six Sigma is all about .... however it is still somewhat used only as a synonym for 'improvement' and does not examine how a mathematical model of a process can be Optimized for both outputs to customer and resources used by the process.

The Lean Enterprise Institute use the word Optimize twice when describing the essence of 'Lean' on its website http://www.lean.org/WhatsLean/  however unfortunately the word and the concept then does not appear again in its tools and techniques or major principles of Lean.

Optimization of both what is important to customers ( VOC ) and internal business measures ( VOB ) often involves conversion of the business problem into a mathematical problem,  and solving the mathematical problem.  This is of course what much of Six Sigma methodology is about,  so fits perfectly into the Lean Six Sigma tool set.    The mathematics is often quite complicated and will require advanced mathematical modelling skills,  however this does not mean that every Lean Six Sigma Green or Black Belt ( or even Master Black Belt ) needs to know the complex mathematics....that where external consultants / academics who are experts in mathematical modeling can be brought into our teams.  It is however important that all Green Belts and Black Belts are introduced to the concepts of Optimization and are clear how it is an important tool to be used in DMAIC ( A and I phases )...and is another fundamental Goal of Lean Six Sigma projects.  In summary I propose a statement such as 'Optimization of Customer most-valued outputs while also Optimizating the process resources'.
One last point... I believe that if the Japanese had introduced their word for it 'Saiteki-ka" and were using it in their TPS system,  then we would all be using it today in the West !   Too late for them ... let's stick with the Engish !

(Nice summary of the mathematical concept  below ( applied to Optimizing Shelf Space in a Supermarket)  and link to where you can read more about it ).

Optimization

Optimization is the science / process behind finding the best solution for a problem with given constraints. We come across optimization problems on a daily basis. These can be for finding the shortest path between your work place and office; maximizing revenues / customer happiness or minimizing costs / debts etc. We basically take a real world problem, model it mathematically and then solve it using mathematical techniques with in the constraints. Optimization is useful in Marketing, Manufacturing, Finance, Online advertising, Machine Learning and all fields you can imagine.
https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2016/09/a-beginners-guide-to-shelf-space-optimization-using-linear-programming/

Optimization : Making the most of what your customers want

During my years teaching in Lean Six Sigma I have found myself using the word 'Optimization' at least once a week during my classes...usually during the part about 'Designed Experiments' and 'Response Surface Methods' ,  however I have recently been thinking that the word 'Optimization' should be introduced to Students much earlier during the "Fundamentals of Lean Six Sigma'' sections of the class.  It strikes me that "Optimization' is the perfect ENGLISH word for the goal of Lean Six Sigma with regards to the Outputs of Processes and the resources that provide them in the process.  Why was it not used more by Toyota,  Motorola or in the books by Womack et al during the growth of Lean Six Sigma in the 1990's ?  In general terms we want to Optimize the 'Value' of the Outputs 'in the eyes of the customer',  while at the same time 'Optimizing'  the use of our resources to deliver that value.  In less general terms Optimization needs to be applied to such Output measures such as Comfort, On-time Delivery,  Product Availability,  Product Purity, Battery Life,  Durability,  Price ...things important to our customers....while at the same time also Optimizing the use of our time, people  machines,  vehicles,  storage space, electricity, energy etc.

Kudos to Joseph Burk and his excellent book ' Cost Reduction and Optimization for Manufacturing and Industrial Companies'  in which he points out specifically that the concepts have been ued in Operations Management in the west for decades,  however Lean Six Sigma still only uses the word either in a very general sense as a synonym for 'improvement'  or else in relation to Designed Experiments.

Interestingly enough,  Lean.org and the Lean Enterprise Institute  ( Womack, Jones, Shook et al ) use the work twice on their webpage giving an overview of Lean,  however it is then hardly mentioned as a tool/method/principle anywhere else.  See http://www.lean.org/WhatsLean/

Opimization is also not included at all in Thomas Pyzdek's 'bible' of Six Sigma,  The Six Sigma Handbook,  which is highly promoted by the ASQ as the 'go-to book'  on Six Sigma.

Optimization of both what is important to customers ( VOC ) and internal business measures ( VOB ) often involves conversion of the business problem into a mathematical problem,  and solving the mathematical problem.  This is of course what much of Six Sigma methodology is about,  so fits perfectly into the Lean Six Sigma tool set.    The mathematics is often quite complicated and will require advanced mathematical modelling skills,  however this does not mean that every Lean Six Sigma Green or Black Belt ( or even Master Black Belt ) needs to know the complex mathematics....that where external consultants / academics who are experts in mathematical modeling can be brought into our teams.  It is however important that all Green Belts and Black Belts are introduced to the concepts of Optimization and are clear how it is an important tool to be used in DMAIC ( A and I phases )...and is another fundamental Goal of Lean Six Sigma projects.  In summary I propose a statement such as 'Optimization of Customer most-valued outputs while also Optimizating the process resources'.
One last point... I believe that if the Japanese had introduced their word for it 'Saiteki-ka" and were using it in their TPS system,  then we would all be using it today in the West !   Too late for them ... let's stick with the Engish !

(Nice summary of the mathematical concept  below ( applied to Optimizing Shelf Space in a Supermarket)  and link to where you can read more about it ).

Optimization

Optimization is the science / process behind finding the best solution for a problem with given constraints. We come across optimization problems on a daily basis. These can be for finding the shortest path between your work place and office; maximizing revenues / customer happiness or minimizing costs / debts etc. We basically take a real world problem, model it mathematically and then solve it using mathematical techniques with in the constraints. Optimization is useful in Marketing, Manufacturing, Finance, Online advertising, Machine Learning and all fields you can imagine.
https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2016/09/a-beginners-guide-to-shelf-space-optimization-using-linear-programming/

Optimization : Making the most of what your customers want

During my years teaching in Lean Six Sigma I have found myself using the word 'Optimization' at least once a week during my classes...usually during the part about 'Designed Experiments' and 'Response Surface Methods' ,  however I have recently been thinking that the word 'Optimization' should be introduced to Students much earlier during the "Fundamentals of Lean Six Sigma'' sections of the class.  It strikes me that "Optimization' is the perfect ENGLISH word for the goal of Lean Six Sigma with regards to the Outputs of Processes and the resources that provide them in the process.  Why was it not used more by Toyota,  Motorola or in the books by Womack et al during the growth of Lean Six Sigma in the 1990's ?  In general terms we want to Optimize the 'Value' of the Outputs 'in the eyes of the customer',  while at the same time 'Optimizing'  the use of our resources to deliver that value.  In less general terms Optimization needs to be applied to such Output measures such as Comfort, On-time Delivery,  Product Availability,  Product Purity, Battery Life,  Durability,  Price ...things important to our customers....while at the same time also Optimizing the use of our time, people  machines,  vehicles,  storage space, electricity, energy etc.
Optimization of both what is important to customers ( VOC ) and internal business measures ( VOB ) often involves conversion of the business problem into a mathematical problem,  and solving the mathematical problem.  This is of course what much of Six Sigma methodology is about,  so fits perfectly into the Lean Six Sigma tool set.    The mathematics is often quite complicated and will require advanced mathematical modelling skills,  however this does not mean that every Lean Six Sigma Green or Black Belt ( or even Master Black Belt ) needs to know the complex mathematics....that where external consultants / academics who are experts in mathematical modeling can be brought into our teams.  It is however important that all Green Belts and Black Belts are introduced to the concepts of Optimization and are clear how it is an important tool to be used in DMAIC ( A and I phases )...and is another fundamental Goal of Lean Six Sigma projects.  In summary I propose a statement such as 'Optimization of Customer most-valued outputs while also Optimizating the process resources'.
One last point... I believe that if the Japanese had introduced their word for it 'Saiteki-ka" and were using it in their TPS system,  then we would all be using it today in the West !   Too late for them ... let's stick with the Engish !

(Nice summary of the mathematical concept  below ( applied to Optimizing Shelf Space in a Supermarket)  and link to where you can read more about it ).

Optimization

Optimization is the science / process behind finding the best solution for a problem with given constraints. We come across optimization problems on a daily basis. These can be for finding the shortest path between your work place and office; maximizing revenues / customer happiness or minimizing costs / debts etc. We basically take a real world problem, model it mathematically and then solve it using mathematical techniques with in the constraints. Optimization is useful in Marketing, Manufacturing, Finance, Online advertising, Machine Learning and all fields you can imagine.
https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2016/09/a-beginners-guide-to-shelf-space-optimization-using-linear-programming/

Friday 2 September 2016

British Standards Institute : An organization with integrity and leading the way with Quality and Process Improvement training programs

John Dennis, Director of Lean Six Sigma Training Ltd at the offices of the British Standards Institute, (founded 1901). We love there slogan ! ... ''BSI...making excellence a habit''



Saturday 20 August 2016

How to calculate the correct Kanban levels for restocking ?

This is a common question that is asked about the use of Kanbans.   Remember that a Kanban is just the fancy ( Japanese ) name for any visual signal or reminder that it is time to re-stock the supply of materials, parts, goods that are needed for the next downstream activity in your process.  This could be restocking a shelf on a supermarket ( ready for the next downstream activity which is the purchase of the goods by the customer ).

Here is the basic formula for deciding the level of how much material, parts, goods etc you should have remaining before you set the 'Kanban'  to alert you that you need to restock.

First you need to know the average usage rate of the materials, part or goods.  This is the rate at which they are moving 'off the shelf'  or 'out of the hopper'  into the next downstream activity in the process.   This average can only be worked out by MEASURING the quantities that move downstream over a fixed time period ( such as 1 hour or 1 day ) and then repeating this at least 30 times, over different periods of the day or week or month,  so that you have representative data of the total work cycle.  Then work out the average of the rate from these 30 rates.  

Then use these same 30 data points to calculate the Standard Deviation.   This is a measure of the variation in the rate at which the materials, parts or goods are moving downstream.

Next we need to know the average time it takes to restock.  This is the average amount time from when we first make the order to restock (  Telephone someone,  or sent and email or order on webpage,  or some other signal to restock ), to when we actually receive the new stock ( materials, parts or goods ) for use.    Again, we have to MEASURE this ( with a clock or watch ) and do this for at least 30 representative orders.   From the 30 times we have measured for re-order time, we calculate the mean average and the standard deviation.

Now that we have the mean avarage rate,  and the standard deviation of the rate,  and the average lead time and its standard deviation,  we can use the following equation to work out the correct level for the Kanban ( visual signal or reminder to restock ).

Kanban reorder level = (Average Usage Rate + 6 stdev) * (Average re-stocking lead time + 6 stdev).


 This will cover you for common cause variation in the process, however will not cover you for special cause outliers (accidents, catastrophic failure etc) . By the very definition of special cause outliers we cannot calculate for them since we cannot predict the failure or its effect , therefore instead of just guessing at amounts of extra 'contingency inventory' for special causes ( such as adding a 'fudge factor'of 15%) , it's better to have a robust contingency plan for alternative suppliers / delivery methods etc for the 'Just in Case ' scenario of your usual supply chain having special cause failure or your Usage Rate having a special cause increase.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

John Dennis 

john@lean6sigmatraining.co.uk


Thursday 4 August 2016

Kanban tools are now used by Pixar, Spotify and Zara

How Kanban systems are used in new cutting edge industries ...HP, Pixar,  Zara and Spotify

Kanban is a Lean Manufacturing Tool for producing items in a highly efficient manner. It’s a scheduling system which tell you what to produce, when to produce it, and how much to produce.
Kanban is also the Japanese word for a visual sign, usually a card with instructions on it, used to schedule and track production from inventory, to manufacturing and delivery.

The simplest Kanban systems employ three stages, which are as follows:
– What we need To do  (  Orders )
– What we are Doing    ( WIP )
– What we have Done   ( Finished Goods )

For HP, the results achieved through implementing Kanban were staggering. In 2006, its Printer Firmware Division, who are based in Boise, Idaho, decided to implement aKanban system as part of a lean initiative. HP attributed 400 per cent of an 800 per cent productivity improvement to Kanban, and also reported a fall in lead times from 21 months to 3.5 months.[i]
Underpinning Toyota’s ‘just-in-time’ (JIT) production system, Kanban has been used to great effect in the automotive industry. But the real selling point of Kanban systems is that they can be used by any industry – from software houses to clothing manufacturers, as the underlying mechanism for managing the production line can still be applied.
So how do other industries use Kanban to improve their businesses? In this revealing blog, I’ll show you how PixarZaraSpotify and the video game industry use Kanban.

 Pixar does not use a traditional assembly line in its creative process, it has been heavily influenced by the Toyota Production System.
Indeed, Pixar may not have conveyor belts connecting each work station, but for Ed Catmull, President of Pixar Animation,  it is vitally important that a film be made in order. Therefore, each team passes the product, or idea to the next team, who in turn pushes it further down the chain.
High-level Kanban boards were used to ensure that this happened. It meant that staff working on a production knew exactly what everyone else was doing, and most importantly how their work directly affected their colleagues.
However, in his bestselling book, Creativity, Inc., Catmull explains that by instilling Lean Manufacturing techniques, he created a work culture where anyone could ‘pull the cord’ and ‘stop the line.’[v]
But for Catmull, this wasn’t enough. He realised that the highest standards of quality could only be achieved if the workforce understood that while ‘efficiency was a goal, quality was the goal.’
For Catmull, Kanban provided proof that Pixar was putting people first, and not just saying that is did.
Catmull talks about how Kanban solved the issue of the ‘beautiful shaped penny.’ This is the penny that the diligent Pixar artist spends hours creating, only to discover that the cinema-goer only catches a tiny glimpse of it, or does not see it at all.
He recounts how a producer, John Walker, devised a system using popsicle sticks so that his team could see what exactly was possible (given limited resources) on each day of production.

Spotify, the world’s biggest subscription streaming music service, has also embraced Kanban.
It’s operation team turned to Kanban after realising that its workload was ‘reactive’ rather than ‘proactive,’ meaning that it struggled to find time to for planned projects.[viii]
The team dealt with problem by sitting down in a relaxed and informal setting to get a clearer idea of what the work it actually did.[ix]
It then asked tasked itself with answering the following questions:
1. What kind of work does it actually do?
2. How much time is spent on the various kinds of work?
3. Is it possible to categorise work into domains in a meaningful way?
4. Where do the jobs come from? Does the Operation team initiate them? If not, who provides it with work?
5. How is it sharing knowledge with other departments?
6. How can it  ensure that operations development gets the time it needs?
7. Is it possible to lower the amount of context-switching that it does?
The working group quickly realised that employing a ‘goalkeeper,’ who could catch all ad hoc requests, would ensure greater levels of efficiency for the team. Small tasks would be carried out straight away, while larger tasks would be written on a Kanban card and placed on the task board.
As for the Kanban board, Spotify’s Operations team decided to make it as simple as possible.
It contains three vertical lanes:
To Do
Doing
Done
Its Kanban board also has two horizontal lanes. Any tangible tasks, such as ‘upgrading the capacity of data storage’ go here, while the other lane comprises of intangible work, which includes tasks such as ‘planning a server migration’ or ‘designing databases.’
Spotify organises work into three separate categories. Jobs are either small, medium or large. Small tasks take a day, medium sized ones a few days, and large jobs a week.
But what about assignments that take more than week? The Operations team refers to such tasks as projects. It simply splits them into small, medium and large tasks, and then inserts them the tasks back into the backlog.
Finally, Spotify was keen not to set too high a Work In Progress (WIP) on the To Do lane to ensure that all intangible tasks are actually completed.




Zara, the biggest fashion retailer in the world, has been using Kanban systems for years, using its ‘just-in-time’ inventory approach first implemented by the Toyota Motor Company. It’s important to state, however, that ‘just-in time’ is actually Lean production. The term ‘Lean’ was coined in 1990. Before that it was called ‘just-in-time.’
Most fashion companies update their collections four-times a year.  Zara, however, breaks all the fashion supply chain rules by holding low stock and updating its collections continuously.
Through its ‘just-in-time’ method, Zara can get product from initial design phase to shop floor in just 15 days. 
It achieves this by staying local in the manufacturing process. So instead of outsourcing to Asia, Zara uses a network of 14 highly automated factories in Spain and over 300 small finishing factories in Morocco, Portugal and Turkey to constantly create unfinished products.
Kanban systems are operated at store level too. Sales managers are responsible for their individual Kanbans. For it is the store manager who has a big says on what is produced, when it is produced, and how much to produce. Twice a week they will send an order to headquarters, which is based on state-of–the-art sales data, as well as anecdotal evidence as to what loyal customers want to see sold on the shop floor.
The commercial team then processes the order, but will also carry out much more detailed and broader research, allowing them to identify the most popular clothing trends. New styles of clothing are added to the order and the order arrives back in the store in just two days.
Zara’s strategy has led to its parent company, Inditex, establishing itself as the largest clothing retailer in the world. But perhaps the greatest compliment is that other clothes retailers are copying the Zara way, by manufacturing longer-lead time grey goods in Asia, but finishing off the garments in the USA. This ensures that the customer receives the goods much more quickly than was previously possible.[xiii]

Sources

[ii] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[iii] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[iv] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[v] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[vi] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull

James Gordon

Kanban tools are now used by Pixar, Spotify and Zara

How Kanban systems are used in new cutting edge industries ...HP, Pixar,  Zara and Spotify

Kanban is a Lean Manufacturing Tool for producing items in a highly efficient manner. It’s a scheduling system which tell you what to produce, when to produce it, and how much to produce.
Kanban is also the Japanese word for a visual sign, usually a card with instructions on it, used to schedule and track production from inventory, to manufacturing and delivery.

The simplest Kanban systems employ three stages, which are as follows:
– What we need To do  (  Orders )
– What we are Doing    ( WIP )
– What we have Done   ( Finished Goods )

For HP, the results achieved through implementing Kanban were staggering. In 2006, its Printer Firmware Division, who are based in Boise, Idaho, decided to implement aKanban system as part of a lean initiative. HP attributed 400 per cent of an 800 per cent productivity improvement to Kanban, and also reported a fall in lead times from 21 months to 3.5 months.[i]
Underpinning Toyota’s ‘just-in-time’ (JIT) production system, Kanban has been used to great effect in the automotive industry. But the real selling point of Kanban systems is that they can be used by any industry – from software houses to clothing manufacturers, as the underlying mechanism for managing the production line can still be applied.
So how do other industries use Kanban to improve their businesses? In this revealing blog, I’ll show you how PixarZaraSpotify and the video game industry use Kanban.

 Pixar does not use a traditional assembly line in its creative process, it has been heavily influenced by the Toyota Production System.
Indeed, Pixar may not have conveyor belts connecting each work station, but for Ed Catmull, President of Pixar Animation,  it is vitally important that a film be made in order. Therefore, each team passes the product, or idea to the next team, who in turn pushes it further down the chain.
High-level Kanban boards were used to ensure that this happened. It meant that staff working on a production knew exactly what everyone else was doing, and most importantly how their work directly affected their colleagues.
However, in his bestselling book, Creativity, Inc., Catmull explains that by instilling Lean Manufacturing techniques, he created a work culture where anyone could ‘pull the cord’ and ‘stop the line.’[v]
But for Catmull, this wasn’t enough. He realised that the highest standards of quality could only be achieved if the workforce understood that while ‘efficiency was a goal, quality was the goal.’
For Catmull, Kanban provided proof that Pixar was putting people first, and not just saying that is did.
Catmull talks about how Kanban solved the issue of the ‘beautiful shaped penny.’ This is the penny that the diligent Pixar artist spends hours creating, only to discover that the cinema-goer only catches a tiny glimpse of it, or does not see it at all.
He recounts how a producer, John Walker, devised a system using popsicle sticks so that his team could see what exactly was possible (given limited resources) on each day of production.

Spotify, the world’s biggest subscription streaming music service, has also embraced Kanban.
It’s operation team turned to Kanban after realising that its workload was ‘reactive’ rather than ‘proactive,’ meaning that it struggled to find time to for planned projects.[viii]
The team dealt with problem by sitting down in a relaxed and informal setting to get a clearer idea of what the work it actually did.[ix]
It then asked tasked itself with answering the following questions:
1. What kind of work does it actually do?
2. How much time is spent on the various kinds of work?
3. Is it possible to categorise work into domains in a meaningful way?
4. Where do the jobs come from? Does the Operation team initiate them? If not, who provides it with work?
5. How is it sharing knowledge with other departments?
6. How can it  ensure that operations development gets the time it needs?
7. Is it possible to lower the amount of context-switching that it does?
The working group quickly realised that employing a ‘goalkeeper,’ who could catch all ad hoc requests, would ensure greater levels of efficiency for the team. Small tasks would be carried out straight away, while larger tasks would be written on a Kanban card and placed on the task board.
As for the Kanban board, Spotify’s Operations team decided to make it as simple as possible.
It contains three vertical lanes:
To Do
Doing
Done
Its Kanban board also has two horizontal lanes. Any tangible tasks, such as ‘upgrading the capacity of data storage’ go here, while the other lane comprises of intangible work, which includes tasks such as ‘planning a server migration’ or ‘designing databases.’
Spotify organises work into three separate categories. Jobs are either small, medium or large. Small tasks take a day, medium sized ones a few days, and large jobs a week.
But what about assignments that take more than week? The Operations team refers to such tasks as projects. It simply splits them into small, medium and large tasks, and then inserts them the tasks back into the backlog.
Finally, Spotify was keen not to set too high a Work In Progress (WIP) on the To Do lane to ensure that all intangible tasks are actually completed.


Zara, the biggest fashion retailer in the world, has been using Kanban systems for years, using its ‘just-in-time’ inventory approach first implemented by the Toyota Motor Company. It’s important to state, however, that ‘just-in time’ is actually Lean production. The term ‘Lean’ was coined in 1990. Before that it was called ‘just-in-time.’
Most fashion companies update their collections four-times a year.  Zara, however, breaks all the fashion supply chain rules by holding low stock and updating its collections continuously.
Through its ‘just-in-time’ method, Zara can get product from initial design phase to shop floor in just 15 days. 
It achieves this by staying local in the manufacturing process. So instead of outsourcing to Asia, Zara uses a network of 14 highly automated factories in Spain and over 300 small finishing factories in Morocco, Portugal and Turkey to constantly create unfinished products.
Kanban systems are operated at store level too. Sales managers are responsible for their individual Kanbans. For it is the store manager who has a big says on what is produced, when it is produced, and how much to produce. Twice a week they will send an order to headquarters, which is based on state-of–the-art sales data, as well as anecdotal evidence as to what loyal customers want to see sold on the shop floor.
The commercial team then processes the order, but will also carry out much more detailed and broader research, allowing them to identify the most popular clothing trends. New styles of clothing are added to the order and the order arrives back in the store in just two days.
Zara’s strategy has led to its parent company, Inditex, establishing itself as the largest clothing retailer in the world. But perhaps the greatest compliment is that other clothes retailers are copying the Zara way, by manufacturing longer-lead time grey goods in Asia, but finishing off the garments in the USA. This ensures that the customer receives the goods much more quickly than was previously possible.[xiii]

Sources

[ii] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[iii] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[iv] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[v] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull
[vi] Creativity, Inc. by Ed Catmull

James Gordon